How to deal with “hizbiyeen” amongst the common Muslims

Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Abdillaah al-Imaam

Reference: Refer to audio file

Category: Da’wah

Question: Groups and sects have become widespread amongst us, and this is the case in almost all of the Muslim lands – except for whoever Allaah has mercy upon – and how small are these people in number (those who have not become affected by deviated sects). What therefore is the principle used in dealing with the common ‘hizbiyeen’?[1]

Answer: The great masses of the Muslims; the large majority of them are to be treated with leniency, patience, advice and to furthermore persevere in advising them from time to time. They are not to be boycotted because they themselves are the ones who are to be preached to; they are the arena in calling to Allaah.

If these people are boycotted then who will we call?? Therefore, these people should be shown goodness, patience, leniency and advice.

All praise is due to Allaah, we have seen much good in them when we become active and face the majority of the Muslims; we have seen a positive effect upon them and they respond well, improve and are open to [our call].

How many acts of Shirk have been abandoned [because of da’wah]? How many actions contradictory to Islaam, innovations and sins have been left alone since the call of Ahl Sunnah first entered in the various communities?

This effect has been consistent throughout various societies, even communities that were enveloped in Soofiyyah, the belief of the shee’ah or partisanship.

So you will find in this much good. Of course, the effect [of da’wah] will differ according to the differing conditions and times. In some of these places, those who call to innovations will be prevalent and they will have some acceptance amongst the people. Due to this type of situation, the message of Ahl Sunnah may not have such an effect and the acceptance amongst the people will be little. However, these types of people require time as well as having more wisdom and patience.

We ask Allaah to make us keys of goodness, and closures to evil.

[1] Hizbiyeen (sing. hizbee) is a word derived from ‘hizbiyyah’ or ‘tahazzub,’ both comprehensive words referring to the action of ascribing to any group, belief or movement opposing the Qur’an, Sunnah and methodology of the pious predecessors. The questioner therefore refers to the ‘average common members of groups opposed to the correct path.’

Translator: Naveed Ayaaz, Abul Abbaas

Date Published: Sunday 15 September, 2013


Shaykh Falah Ismaeel likens ungrateful spubbers to Dajjal’s gang

Shaykh Falaah Ismaeel exposing the foolishness of following jarh from unknown people such as Ahmad Bazmool and others. The video is in arabic but it has english translation. Please click the facebook link to watch video with translation.

Speech of Shaykh Falaah Ismayeel in comparison with the speech of Abu Khadija and Ahmad Bazmool in regards to Shaykh Ali Hasan

As salaamu alaykum

Here is a short biography of Shaykh Falaah Islameel and the source is

Translated by: Akram bin Muhammad Abdul-Qaadir as-Seelaanee an-Najdee

His Name and Kunya: Aboo Muhammad Falaah bin Ismaaýeel bin Ahmad Mundakaar

His Birth: The noble Shaykh was born in the year 1950

His seeking of Knowledge:
The Shaykh began seeking knowledge ý after studying in the English language- and his age was 16 years of age, so he traveled to the people of knowledge to take from them. And he started his university level studies in the Islaamic University of Madeenah al-Munawwarah and that was in the year 1976. And he accompanied the scholars during his university studies and he prepared his thesis for the Masters and the Doctorates and he studied with them the ýAqeedah and Hadeeth and Science of Hadeeth and Fiqh and itýs Usool and the Principles of Fiqh and Grammar and Morphology and Balaaghah and Tajweed.

His Qualifications in Knowledge:
The Shaykh ý May Allaah Preserve him – earned a number of Diplomas and they are:

ýBachelors degree, and the Shaykh ý May Allaah Preserve him – earned a level of Excellent.

ýMasters Degree, and the Shaykh ý May Allaah Preserve him ý earned a level of Excellent and his thesis was an examination of three of the volumes of Shuýab al-Eemaan of al-Haafidh al-Bayhaqee ý May Allaah have Mercy on him-

ýDoctorates Degree, and the Shaykh ý May Allaah Preserve him ý earned a level of excellent along with an honorarium. His thesis was titled, ýAl-ýAllaaqah bayn at-Tassawwuf wat Tashayyuýý (ýThe relation between Soofism and Sheeýismý)

His Scholars:
The Shaykh ý May Allaah Preserve him ý studied with a number of the major scholars and from them are:

ýHis Eminence, the Shaykh, the ýAllaamah, ýAbdul-ýAzeez bin ýAbdullaah bin Baaz ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he attended many of the sittings of knowledge and read to him ýal-Usool ath-Thalaathaý and ýKitaab at-Tawheedý.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, the scholar of Hadeeth, Muhammad Naasir ad-Deen al-Albaanee in the house of Shaykh Falaah two times: once in Madeenah and once in Kuwait.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, The Faqeeh, The Usoolee, The Muffassir, Muhammad bin Saaleh al-ýUthaymeen ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he attended many of his sittings of knowledge and he studied with him some chapters from Fiqh.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, Doctor Saalih bin Fawzaan al-Fawzaan ý May Allaah Preserve him ý and he attended many of his sittings of knowledge.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, the scholar of Hadeeth, ýAbdul-Qaadir bin Habeebullaah as-Sindee ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he was from the Major scholars in Madeenah an-Nabawiyyah. And he read to him ýNukhbatul Fikrý of al-Haafidh ibn Hajar al-ýAsqalaanee ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý

ýThe Noble Shaykh, the scholar of Hadeeth in al-Hijaaz, Doctor Hammaad bin Muhammad al-Ansaaree ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he ý May Allaah Preserve him – took a lot from the Shaykh, and he accompanied him a lot and very much benefited from him, and read to him ýSaheeh al-Bukhaareeý, and ýal-Ibaanahý of Ibn Battah, and ýan-Nubuwwaatý of Shaykh al-Islaam ibn Taymiyyah, and ýKitaab at-Tawheedý of ibn Khuzaymah, and ýKitaab at-Tawheedý of Shaykh al-Islaam Muhammad bin ýAbdul-Wahhaab, and ýBuloogh al-Maraamý of al-Haafidh ibn Hajar al-ýAsqalaanee, just as he read to him from the Tafseer of the Qurýaan.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, Doctor Muhammad Amaan bin ýAlee al-Jaamee ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he took a lot of knowledge from the Shaykh, and benefited from him a great benefit, and read to him ýal-Qawaaýid al-Muthlaaý of al-ýAllaamah al-ýUthaymeen ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and ýKitaab at-Tawheedý of Shaykh al-Islaam Muhammad bin ýAbdul-Wahhaab and ýAqeedatul Waasitiyyahý of Shaykh al-Islaam ibn Taymiyyah and ýSharh ýAqeedatut Tahaawiyyahý of ibn Abil ýIzz al-Hanafee ý May Allaah have Mercy upon them all -. And he studied with him as well the nature of Tawheed in the ýAqeedah of the Ashýarees then Shaykh Muhammad gave to Shaykh Falaah a copy of this book with his notes with his handwriting. And it was published in the year 1306 after the Hijrah. And Shaykh Falaah did not cease to be cautious with this copy and he holds it in high esteem. And he corresponded with the department of ýAqeedah in the Islaamic University and Shaykh Muhammad Amaan al-Jaamee ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý was the director for the thesis of the Shaykh in his Masters.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, Doctor ýAbdul-Kareem bin Muraad al-Atharee ý May Allaah Preserve him ý and he studied with him ýal-Fataawa al-Hamawiyyahý and ýar-Risaalah at-Tadmooriyyahý and ýSharh ýAqeedah at-Tahaawiyyahý of ibn Abil ýIzz al-Hanafee. And Shaykh ýAbdul-Kareem Muraad ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý was from one of the debaters for the Shaykh ý May Allaah Preserve him – in his Masters thesis.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, Doctor ýAbdul-Muhsin bin Hammad al-ýAbbaad ý May Allaah Preserve him ý and he was the director for the Islaamic University. And he read to him ýKitaab ash-Shareeýahý of al-Aajurree and ýShifaaý al-ýAleelý of Ibnul Qayyim. And Shaykh ýAbdul-Muhsin al-ýAbbaad ý May Allaah Preserve him ý was from one of the debaters for the Shaykh ý May Allaah Preserve him ý in his Masters thesis.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, the scholar of Hadeeth, al-Ustaadh Doctor Rabeeý bin Haadee al-Madkhalee, and he earned a high seat in the University in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Chair of the teachers). And he read to him ýSaheeh Muslimý and ýTadreeb ar-Raaweeý of al-Haafidh an-Nawawee ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and ýal-ýUboodiyyahý of Shaykh al-Islaam ibn Taymiyyah.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, Doctor ýAlee bin Naasir al-Faqeehee ý May Allaah Preserve him ý and he read to him ýKitaab at-Tawheedý and ýKitaabul Eemaaný all of them from al-Haafidh ibn Mundih ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý just as he studied with him valuable classes on al-Millal wan-Nihal.

ýThe Noble Shaykh al-Fardhee, ýAbdus Samad bin Muhammad al-Kitaab ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he read to him ýKitaab at-Tawheedý from ýSaheeh al-Bukhaareeý just as he read to him ýIlm al-Faraaýid Imlaa

ýThe Noble Shaykh ýUbayd bin ýAbdillaah al-Jaabiree ý May Allaah Preserve him ý and he is from the Major scholars of Madeenah an-Nabawiyyah. He read to him ýKitaab at-Tawheedý of Shaykh Muhammad bin ýAbdul-Wahhaab ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and ýAl-Qawaaýid al-Muthlaaý and ýAl-Qawaaýid al-Fiqhiyyahý.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, Doctor ýAbdullaah bin Muhammad al-Ghunaymaan ý May Allaah Preserve him ý and he read to him ýFath-ul-Majeedý and ýKitaabul Eemaaný of Shaykh al-Islaam ibn Taymiyyah, and Shaykh ýAbdullaah al-Ghunaymaan ý May Allaah Preserve him ý was the director of the Shaykhýs thesis in his Doctorates.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, the Muffassir, Muhammad bin al-Mukhtaar ash-Shanqeetee ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he took from him the knowledge of Tafseer in the Islaamic University and in the Haram al-Madanee ash-Shareef, and he read to him ýSunan an-Nasaaýeeý as well.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, Doctor ýAlee bin ýAbdur-Rahmaan al-Hudhayfee ý May Allaah Preserve him ý and he read to him ýKitaab at-Tawheedý from ýSaheeh al-Bukhaareeý.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, the Muffassir, the Usoolee, the Grammarian, Ahmad bin Taaweet at-Tanjee ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he is from the scholars of al-Maghrib (Morrocco). And he used to be ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý was a Judge, a Judge of Tanjah during the time of the French Colonialization of Morrocco. And he took from the Shaykh the knowledge of Tafseer in the Islaamic University and he read to him in Usool al-Fiqh and ýRawdatun Naadhirý of Ibn Qudaamah in the Haram al-Madanee. And he read to him from the knowledge of the language, ýSharh Alfiyyah ibn Maaliký of ibn ýAqeel.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, ýAlee bin Sinaan ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he was from the scholars of Madeenah an-Nabawiyyah, and he read to him ýQatarun Nadaaý.

ýThe Noble Shaykh of the Language, Ahmad bin Maýloom ash-Shanqeetee ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he was from one of the scholars of the language in Madeenah an-Nabawiyyah and he has an explanation of Alfiyyah ibn Maalik, which he compose in three compositions. And he read to him ýal-Muqaddimah al-Aajurroomiyyahý and ýSharh Alfiyyah ibn Maaliký of Ibn ýAqeel ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý

ýThe Noble Shaykh, the Usoolee, Doctor Zaynul ýAabideen ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him -. And he read to him ýRawdatun Naadhirý of Ibn Qudaamah.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, the Faqeeh ýAbdullaah bin Haamid al-Hammaad ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he read to him ýSubal as-Salaamý

ýThe Noble Shaykh, the Faqeeh, Muhammad bin Hamood al-Waaýilee ý May Allaah Preserve him ý and he read to him ýBidaayatul Mujtahidý of Ibn Rushd.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, ýAbdur-Raýoof al-Libdee ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he was from the scholars of the language in Madeenah an-Nabawiyyah and he read to him ýSharh Alfiyyah ibn Maaliký of Ibn ýAqeel.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, Mahmood as-Samaahee ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he was from the scholars of Fiqh in Madeenah an-Nabawiyyah, and he read to him ýBidaayah al-Mujtahidý

ýThe Noble Shaykh ýUmar bin Muhammad Falaatah ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he read to him ýSunan Abee Daawoodý.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, the Muffassir, Aboo Bakr al-Jazaaýiree ý May Allaah Preserve him ý and he took from him the knowledge of Tafseer and he used to attend his classes in the Haram al-Madanee.

ýThe Noble Shaykh Ahmad al-Azraq ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he read to him ýSubal as-Salaamý the explanation of Buloogh al-Maraam.

ýThe Noble Shaykh ýAlee bin Musharraf al-ýUmree ý May Allaah Preserve him ý and Imaam al-Albaanee ý May Allaah Preserve him ý nicknamed him ýal-Albaanee as-Sagheerý (the smaller al-Albaanee), ad he read to him ýSunan at-Tirmidheeý.

ýThe Noble Shaykh, the Recitor, Muhammad bin Ramadhaan al-Muqree ý May Allaah have Mercy upon him ý and he took from him the knowledge of Tajweed.
And from what we mentioned from the Scholars of the Noble shaykh Falaah, they are some of those whom the Shaykh had studied with and taken knowledge from.
Description of his Manners

The Shaykh ý May Allaah Preserve him ý is distinguished by good character, and manners in his actions, and desire to benefit and seek benefit, and humble with his students and brothers, and endeavors to judge justly in their affairs, and his concern for the Book and the Sunnah and the ýAqeedah of Ahlus Sunnah wal-Jamaaýah, and he is honored with the people of knowledge and his students in a high position, and esteem, and respect. From the most distinguishing signs of the Shaykh in his Manners is a constant smile which never leaves his face when he speaks to others and answers their questions.

And the Shaykh ý and All Praise is Due to Allaah ý it is witnessed with the one who is far and near in a high position and good character and a lot of manners, and for that he is similar to a father for all the Salafees in Kuwait.

His efforts in Knowledge and Daýwah:
The Shaykh has many efforts in spreading knowledge, he joins in many of the Knowledge Seminars, and is active in spreading Daýwah that is found in Kuwait and which benefits the Students of Knowledge.

And the Shaykh ý May Allaah Preserve him – is distinguished with his knowledge-based activity, and he gives classes on the various books of Ahlus Sunnah wal-Jamaaýah, and from the books and texts that the Noble Shaykh ý May Allaah Preserve him- teaches and he does not cease to teach some of them:

ýal-Usool ath-Thalaatha
ýKashf ash-Shubuhaat
ýAl-Usool as-Sittah
ýSharh ýAqeedatul Waasitiyyah of Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan
ýAl-Fataawa al-Hamawiyyah
ýSharh ýAqeedatut Tahaawiyyah of Ibn Abil ýIzz
ýSharh as-Sunnah of al-Barbahaaree
ýAsh-Shareeýah of al-Aajurree
ýAl-Uddah Sharh al-ýUmdah
ýAl-Arbaýeen an-Nawawee

And the Shaykh ý May Allaah Preserve him ý does not cease to teach the students of knowledge in Kuwait and outside of it, just as he does not cease to teach ýAqeedah in the Islaamic University of Kuwait. And the Shaykh ý May Allaah Preserve him ý takes part in the Methodology of ýAqeedah in spreading Islaamic education in the Ministry of Education in the country of Kuwait.

His Methodology of Teaching:
The Shaykh ý May Allaah Preserve him- is distinguished in his unique style in teaching. And from the most important of what distinguishes the Shaykh in his teaching:

ýExamination of knowledge-based Issues in the chapter of Beliefs by mentioning the statements of the Salaf and the Muhaqqiqeen in these issues.

ýA way of explaining matters of beliefs by using general principles of the Manhaj of the Salaf ý May Allaah have Mercy upon them ý

ýMentioning the statements of the differing sects to Ahlus Sunnah wal-Jamaaýah in matters of Belief, and refuting them from the Book and the Sunnah and the language of the ýArab and the statements of the Salaf.

ýMuch of what the Shaykh ý May Allaah Preserve him ý relates from his scholars from what he learned from them, so he mentions their statements and in the matters which they have explained.

ýVerify the text of the book being explained.

ýMentioning the statements of the Fuqahaa, Muhadditheen, and Muhaqiqeen from the people of knowledge and their Madhhab in explaining the matters of Fiqh, and using the Daleel of their Madhhab from the Book and the Sunnah and the rest of the proofs of the rulings, then comparing and giving preference of the statements of the Fuqahaa.

His authorship:
1 ý al-ýAllaaqah bayn at-Tassawwuf wat-Tashyeeý (Doctorate Thesis)
2 ý Tahqeeq Thalaath min Shuýab al-Eemaan (Masters Thesis)
3 ý Nazýat at-Takfeer, Khutooratihaa wa ýAlaajihaa
4 ý Ar-Ruqya ash-Shareeýah bayn at-Tanzeel wat Tatbeeq
5 ý al-Iýtiqaad al-Waajib Nahw as-Sahaabah
6 ý al-Iýtiqaad al-Waajib Nahw al-Qadr
7 ý al-Ashaaýirah Laysoo min Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaaýah (It is an comment on four statements worth being spread in Kuwait)
8 ý al-ýAqeedah Awalan (A published in the Magazine ýash-Shareeýahý)
9 ý al-Akhlaaq al-Islaamiyyah (Notes from the University)
10 ý al-Milal wan Nihal (Notes from the University)
11 ý ýAqeedah (2) (Notes from the University)

We ask Allaah to preserve our Shaykh, and benefit others through his knowledge, and bless him in his efforts, and reward him in his Islaam and the Muslims with good.

“Taken from Mahad-ul-Furqan .org website”


Below is the posts from where the evil speeches has been spread about Shaykh Ali Hasan. Once you read the speech of Shaykh Falaah and then compare it with the speeches of Abu khadija and rest, and its simply obvious that they are manipulating the ummah to hate Shaykh Ali and boycott him. Allaahu alaam as to why they intend to harm the legacy of Shaykh Albani rahimallah yet claim to be adherents of minhaj of salaf yet attack the pillars of salafi minhaj in this era. May Allaah guide them if not save the ummah from evil of spubs. Ameen


Ali Hasan bin Ali bin Abdul-Hameed al-Halabi is from Jordan. He first came to the UK in 1993. He was lauded as a student of the Imaam, the Muhaddith Muhammad Naasir ad-Deen al-Albaanee (rahimahullaah). Though young in age, he became known for sitting in the sessions of Shaikh Al-Albaanee in Jordan during the later years of the life of the Shaikh.

He was a very close companion of Saleem al-Hilaalee and Muhammad Moosa Nasr. In fact all three visited the UK in 1995 – and then their collective and individual visits became more and more regular.

After 1995 they started making regular visits to the USA, Canada, Europe and the Far East. Indeed they became famous due to their visitations of these various locations. One could venture as far as to say that in those times they were more well-known in the West than they were in the Middle-East, wallaahu a’lam.

In the early days whilst Shaikh Al-Albaanee (rahimahullaah) was alive, they were cautious about their stances towards ahlul-bid’ah and the hizbiyyeen. They would warn against them in general and in sittings with the du’aat (in the UK), they would clearly warn against the likes of the Kuwaiti group known as Ihyaa Turaath al-Islaamee and the followers of Muhammad Suroor. Indeed they would also warn against the likes of Safar al-Hawaalee, Salmaan al-Awdah and the other Qutubees. ALL of this of course in line with the crystal clear manhaj of Shaikh Al-Albaanee.

So the Salafis in general would speak good of them due to this and defend them upon this – believing that they were carrying the aqeedah and manhaj of the Muhaddith and Imaam, Shaikh Al-Albaanee.

However, as time went by, we noticed some contradictions between what they were calling to in public and what they would say in private gatherings
and insinuations they would make in lectures. They would make disparaging remarks towards other well-known scholars. They would try and restrict the
da’wah around them. They would disregard the refutations of the scholars if they opposed their close companions. So we found them defending the likes of Adnaan al-Ar’oor and Muhammad al-Maghraawee.

In 1999, only a few months before the death of Shaikh Al-Albaanee – Abul-Hasan al-Ma’rabi and Saleem al-Hilaalee enforced and imposed upon the Salafi du’aat in the UK a contract containing a command to refer all religious and manhaj affairs/disputes back to Ali Hasan and Saleem al-Hilaalee to the exclusion of the Scholars.

Many of the brothers still remember how Saleem al-Hilaalee and Abul-Hasan gloated at the Salafis, proud to have overpowered them with threats and bullying. Alhamdulillaah, most of the Salafi students of knowledge rejected the contract and either refused to sign or did not bother turning up to the signing. This resulted in several years whereby these very same Jordanians (who had now departed from the teachings of Shaikh Al-Albaanee) warned against the Salafi du’aat who stuck to the scholars in Riyaadh, Madeenah and the South (Saamitah). Wherever they would travel in the West, they would now warn against good Salafi students of knowledge, in Canada, in the USA, in France and across Europe. They tried to raise themselves up as the vanguards of the Salafi da’wah whereas in reality they defended the people of desires, promoted the manhaj of tamyee’ and watering down of the clear Salafi principles.

The issue came to a head during the fitnah of Abul-Hasan al-Ma’rabi (a few years later) when these individuals took to following their desires in opposition to the evidences (when the evidences were brought to them, they refused to accept them) – they waged a campaign against many of the scholars of the Sunnah, such as Shaikh Rabee’, Shaikh Ubaid, Shaikh Ahmad an-Najmee, Shaikh Zaid al-Madkhalee and Shaikh Muhammad bin Haadee. All this after the death of Shaikh al-Albaanee.

They started making more and more apparent their disdain for the Scholars of Saudi such as Shaikh Muhammad bin Haadee and Shaikh Rabee’. They would openly defend those who the scholars warned against such as al-Maghraawee, Ar’oor, Muhammad al-Hassaan, Abul-Hasan al-Ma’rabi. They would not defend these deviants upon knowledge, but upon desires – they would reject clear-cut evidences presented by the likes of Shaikh Rabee’ and Shaikh
Ubaid al-Jaabiree. Their counter-argument would never go beyond, “there is no consensus of the scholars in their jarh of al-Ma’rabi”(!!) or “Shaikh so-and-so still has not refuted him” or “Shaikh Rabee’ is not a hujjah” (!!) etc. So thousands of Salafis in the West realised the games they were playing and so kept their distance from them.

They would raise themselves to a position where they regarded themselves as equals to the likes of Shaikh Rabee’, Shaikh Muqbil and Shaikh Ahmad an-
Najmee. So much so that many of the youth in the West would regard Ali Hasan and Saleem al-Hilaalee to contemporaries of Shaikh Rabee’ bin Haadee! The reality is that they are not equal or contemporaries of Shaikh Rabee’ – not in ‘ilm and not in age.

Then the Shaytaan led them to the very same Jam’iyyah they used to warn against: Jam’iyyah Ihyaa Turaath of Kuwait! They started working with them
and taking their wealth!

After all this they split amongst themselves, Saleem al-Hilaalee (freed himself and) split from Ali al-Halabi and the others, and their followers likewise split amongst themselves.

So now the scholars warn openly against the innovations of Ali Hasan al-Halabi. Shaikh Ahmad bin Umar Baazmool (hafidhahullaah) compiled a 804 page book in refutation of the deviations of Ali Hasan, called: “Siyaanatus-Salafee min Waswasati wa Talbisaat Ali al-Halabi” – This book is an amazing compilation. So get a copy O Salafi, and remain upon clarity.


Shaikh Fawzaan on Saying “Madkhalis”

Shaikh Fawzaan on Saying “Madkhalis”

س/ نطلب من شيخنا الفاضل التنبيه على أمر ما قد انتشر في الآونة الأخيرة بين بعض الطلاب ألا وهو: +نبز بعض العلماء الأفاضل إلى من يستمع إليهم بأن هؤلاء جاميون وهؤلاء مداخلة ، ويقصدون بذلك شيخنا العالم رحمه الله محمد أمان الجامي وشيخنا الفاضل حفظه الله وسدد خطاه ربيع بن هادي المدخلي وصلى اللهم وبارك على نبينا محمد .

Question: We would like to draw your attention, our noble Shaikh, to an affair that has spread lately between some of the students and that is: the insulting of some of the noble ulama to those who are listening by saying : ‘Those (people) are Jaamee’oon

and ‘Those (people) are Madaakhilah (Madkhalis)’, and what they mean by that is our Shaikh and Scholar – rahimahullah- Muhammad Amaan al Jaamee and our Noble Shaikh – hafidhahullah (Allah preserve him) and guide his steps – Rabee ibn Hadee al Madkhalee. O Allah exalt our Prophet Muhammad and bless him.

الجواب: هذا داخل في جواب الذي انتهيت منه قريباً، اتركوا هذه الأمور وهذا التنابز ولا تنابزوا بالألقاب الله جل وعلا قال لكم:[ وَلَا تَنَابَزُوا بِالْأَلْقَابِ] (سورة الحجرات الآية:11).
كلكم إخوة، وكلكم أهل دين واحد، كلكم زملاء ولله الحمد ، فانبذوا هذه الأمور واحترموا العلماء احترموا العلماء، من لم يحترم العلماء فإنه يحرم من علمهم يحرم من الاستفادة منهم ، اتركوا هذا الأمر تنابز بينكم وتناول العلماء الذين لهم الفضل ولهم على الناس المنزلة التي أنزلهم الله فيها { [يَرْفَعِ اللَّهُ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا مِنْكُمْ وَالَّذِينَ أُوتُوا الْعِلْمَ دَرَجَاتٍ]،(سورة المجادلة الآية:11).

Answer: This enters into the answer I finished with recently. Leave these affairs – this is insulting each other, so do not insult each other by nicknames. Allah, Lofty and Exalted is He, told you (translated):

‘And do not insult each other with nicknames’


All of you are brothers and all of you are the people of one religion. All of you (students of knowledge and Scholars) are colleagues and to Allah is due all the praise. So turn away from these affairs and honor and respect the ulama, honor and respect them. Whoever doesn’t honor and respect the ulama, then he prevents (the people) from their knowledge and he prevents (the people) from benefitting from them. Leave this affair of insulting each other. Take from the ulama – they are the ones who have virtue and who have a status over the people that Allah has given them:

‘Allah will raise in degrees those of you who believe and those who have been given knowledge’ (58:11)

العلماء لهم مكانتهم ولهم قدرهم واحترامهم وإذا لم يوثق بالعلماء فبمن يوثق ؟
إذا نزعت الثقة من العلماء إلى من يرجع الناس ؟ هذه مكيدة لا شك ودسيسة لا شك بين الناس فيجب التنبه لها ويجب نبذها والابتعاد عنها والنهي عنها.اهـ

The ulama – they have their status and they have their rank and their respect. When a person does not deem the ulama to be trustworthy , then in whom will they put their trust ? If people’s confidence in the ulama is removed, then who will the people turn to? Without a doubt this is a deceptive plot and conspiracy from some people that it is obligatory to be aware of. And it is obligatory to turn away from it (insulting by nicknames to turn people away from the ulama of Ahlus Sunnah), and distance onself from it, and prohibit it

المرجع: نقلاً من محاضرة بعنوان (واجب طالب العلم بعد التخرج) في الجامعة الإسلامية بالمدينة النبوية وكانت يوم الإربعاء الموافق 8/4/1431هــ .

Taken from a lecture titled: ‘What is obligatory on the student of knowledge after graduation’ at the Islamic University of Madinah corresponding with Wednesday, 8th of Rabee uth Thanee 1431 Hijree

Transcription source:-
Audio source:

Fundamental Shi’ite Beliefs with the Letter of Recommendation by Shiekh Bin Baz rahimallah

The Title: Fundamental Shi’ite Beliefs
Language: English
Formation : Abdullah ibn Muhammad As-Salafi
Translators : Abdur-Rahman Murad
Short Description: An important book shows the corrupt belief of Shi’ites. The author said in the introduction, “I wrote this book for a number of reasons including: (1) The increased efforts of the Shi’ites to spread their ideology in the Muslim world. (2) The danger of this deviant sect poses on Islam. (3) The ignorance of many Muslims about the danger of this deviant sect. (4) The corrupt Aqeedah (belief system) of the Shi’ites, which includes polytheism, defamation of the Quran and defamation of the Companions of the Prophet, may Allah be pleased with them all. (5) Their extreme beliefs in relation to their imams.”

Click Here to Download Responds to the Unfounded Accusations – 3 Responds to the Unfounded Accusations – 3

Download PDF version here

Maintaining Integrity, Honesty & Justice in Criticism, as Opposed to the Deception of Salafi Publications – C

Allaah the Mighty and Majestic says:

O you who believe! Stand out firmly for Allaah as just witnesses; and let not the enmity and hatred of others allow you to avoid justice. Be just: that is closer to piety; and fear Allaah. Indeed, Allaah is Well-Acquainted with what you do.[1]

At-Tabaree comments:

“Do not let enmity between you and others cause you to be unjust in your dealings and rulings with them such that you oppress them due to the enmity that is between you.”[2]

Allaah the Elevated says:

Verily, Allaah enjoins justice, beneficence, giving (help) to kith and kin, and forbids all forms of evil and Al-Munkar (i.e. all that is prohibited by Islamic law). He admonishes you, that you may take heed.[3]

Ibn Katheer comments:

“Allaah orders his servants with justice, which is fairness and equity, and encourages them to be beneficent.”[4]

The Messenger of Allaah – صلى الله عليه و سلم – informed us that Allaah said:

“O My Servants, indeed I have prohibited injustice for Myself, and I have prohibited it amongst you.”[5]

Shaykh ‘Abdul ‘Azeez Aal Ash-Shaykh comments:

“This is general to all mankind, whether they are Muslim or not, it is not permissible for any one person to oppress another, even if they were adversaries or harbored enmity for one another. Enmity and hatred do not authorize anyone in the legislation of Islam to be unjust or oppressive.”

We begin with these statements from Allaah and His Messenger as a reminder for ourselves and an admonition for the brothers at Salafi Publications who have proven to be unjust with the misinformation and lies they are passing to the Scholars, continuously fueling Fitnah to the general masses in the West, diverting them from more important affairs in the religion of Islaam that they need to tend to.

There is an underlying theme in much of the information Salafi Publications present to their audience regarding the statements of the people of knowledge; it can be summarized as follows:

1. They rarely reveal the questions or information they pass on to the scholars; in many instances they conceal the question and present the response. The rare occasions in which they have published such information brings to light the misinformation they are passing on to the people of knowledge.

2. In contrast to the standards applies, they rarely provide the Arabic text or audio for what they are translating. Again, the rare occasions where they have done so reveal evidence of mistranslation or deception concerning the speech of the scholars.

3. They insist on speaking to the people of knowledge in the absence of those they are speaking about, avoiding a situation where the reality of affairs can be clarified or their version of events can be challenged. They follow this method even with those whom they admit are Salafees.

We will provide undeniable evidence for these points, not hollow claims based upon assumptions which are void of any tangible evidence; proving without a shadow of a doubt that Salafi Publications are untrustworthy concerning what they narrate to public as well as to the people of knowledge.

On one of the rare occasions where the question posed to Shaykh ‘Ubaid al-Jaabiree (may Allaah preserve him) has been published; it reveals not only deception, but that the question was tampered with after it was posed and before being presented to the English speaking audience. In it the questioner asks:

Question: “May Allaah preserve you, this is the fourth question. The questioner says, “[Regarding] our brothers at Maktabah Salafiyyah, recently people in the West began to free themselves from the brothers, either by way of not attending the lessons at the mosque … and likewise, internationally, some of them have websites on the Internet, they have removed the links to the websites of the brothers at Maktabah Salafiyyah. And there are some amongst them who call them, or who accuse them with (being) Ghulaat, (and as a result) they remove the link that is on their site to (the websites of) Maktabah Salafiyyah[6], or they say to Maktabah Salafiyyah remove the link to our site from your site.”

So what is the extent of cooperation that is desirable with our brothers at Maktabah Salafiyyah in Birmingham.”[7]

This is one of the extremely rare occasions that an audio file with the Arabic has been presented along with the question, we would like to make the following observations:

a) The question was introduced as “The Noble Shaykh was asked by the Salafees from Toronto, Canada (TROID)…”, while the reality is that only one person was asking the question. It could be that all the Salafees of Toronto have agreed that this one individual represents them, or that he considers himself to be ‘the Salafees from Toronto’. This deceptive misconception of restricting Salafiyyah to a limited number of people, or person, by referring to themselves/himself with the term ‘the salafees’ has previously been addressed in document 1a.

b) Something has been omitted from the translation and replaced with “…” as can be seen in the question. The omitted phrase is “and people stopped donating to them”. Please note that the question has been tampered with and was not presented in the same way it was posed. Were it not that the audio file was attached, this deception could not have been proven. Tampering with a question by deleting, changing or adding parts to it after it was posed to a scholar totally betrays the trust of conveying knowledge accurately. This type of deception can only be carried out by someone who already understands his guilt by posing a question with false information, which is what led him/them to deceitfully conceal it before publishing it.

If this statement is false; “that people stopped donating to them”, why was it mentioned to the Shaykh in the question? It could only be to create a scenario that Salafi Publications are in a state of poverty and are in dire need of support, which is in line with the rest of the disconsolate aura of the question.

If the statement is true, why has it been deceitfully concealed after it was posed in the question?

Is it not from trustworthiness to narrate and translate accurately? Deliberate omission or tampering with questions after they were posed removes one from being considered as trustworthy in this regard as well as is in his other translations and narrations. Such a person cannot be trusted concerning other information he is narrating especially if the original Arabic sources and audio files are not made available to ascertain the accuracy of translation; which is the great majority of what Salafi Publications produces.

c) “Recently people in the West began to free themselves from the brothers, either by way of not attending the lessons at the mosque … and likewise, internationally…”

Is this statement correct? Were people ‘freeing themselves from Salafi Publications’? Is this the reality that the Shaykh is being informed of?

Let us present some examples of the what they propagated in the West – from their own websites – concerning this affair during roughly the same period this question was being posed to the Mashayikh:

“Just to mention that over the period of the conference:

* An estimated 1,500-2,000 people attended – Which included people from as far as Germany and Holland, masha’Allaah!

* The “SalafiPublications” room on Paltalk reached its capacity of 250 people during some of the lessons….”[8]


“Alhamdu lillaah the conference was a great success. The Masjid was absolutely full…”[9]

In another instance, this post was actually titled:

“Conference gathers thousands! Al-hamdulillaah”[10]

Yet another…

“The Masjid was full beyond capacity – people prayed outside! Both the men’s area and the women’s area was full. The atmosphere was nice, and the weather nice and warm.”[11]

“MashAllaah today the Salafi Publications Live room was also full and another room ‘Maktabas Salafiyyah’ had to be opened!”[12]

And there are many other examples but it should suffice that we present quotes from the period before, during and after this question was posed to the Shaykh – which leads us to ask:

Who is being lied to here, the Mashayikh or the people? Is it that people are abandoning Salafi Publications by way of not attending their lessons both locally and internationally and freeing themselves from them as the question states? Or is it that during their lessons, both locally and internationally the Masjids and Internet rooms are full beyond capacity? Two opposites cannot be true, so which one is it? They are either lying to the public or lying to the scholars. Again, this is solid evidence from their own websites.

As a side note of advice, success in Da’wah is achieved by Allaah accepting the efforts, not by the number of people present. Some Messengers had few or no followers, yet they were still successful. The people of Hizbiyyah and innovations may draw huge numbers to their events, yet they are still unsuccessful.

d) “Some of them have websites on the Internet, they have removed the links to the websites of the brothers at Maktabah Salafiyyah”

Again, is this the reality; is it true that websites started removing their links?

If this is the case when the audio file of the questions they are posing is made available, what is happening with that which they conceal and only provide their translated version of? In this rare occasion, is the Shaykh being informed of the reality; that people are freeing themselves from Salafi Publications, abandoning their lessons, refraining from donating to them and deleting their links? Or is there a well-planned strategy being employed to create a picture to the Shaykh in an attempt to extract a favorable response of support, while the contrasting reality is what we have quoted them saying from their own websites?

Towards the East, in Saudi Arabia, the message being relayed is that Salafi Publications is on the verge of collapse unless support is provided – thereby gaining sympathy from some Mashaykh. Towards the West, the message of success is being relayed; that thousands are gathering to the point that neither the Masjids nor the Internet rooms have the capacity to maintain such numbers. Which of the following situations is the reality and why the need to portray two contrasting scenarios to different parties?

In another quote the Shaykh says:

“…that fifteen people left the Maktabah…”[13]

If indeed this were the reality, what is the use of asking such questions or making such complaints to the people of knowledge? What type of response is anticipated by posing such questions or complaints? Wasn’t the saved sect described as being people upon the truth who are not harmed by those who oppose or forsake them as has come in the well known narration, even if only one person were to remain upon the truth? Why complain that people are forsaking them and numbering them to the scholars thereby trying to extract a word of support?

In another example where a question to Shaykh Falaah Isma’eel (may Allaah preserve him) is revealed, he was asked:

“What do you advise those who establish attacks upon this Masjid,”

To which he includes in his response:

“I say that this attack or criticism, just as I said a little while ago, ‘Establish the throne then debate![14]…’”

Again, look at what the Shaykh is being told; yet again Salafi Publications are ‘informing’ the people of knowledge that they are being attacked! So the answer is provided based upon the information presented in the question and it is not the Shaykh who has made this observation himself. Rather, it is Salafi Publications who are deceitfully misinforming the people of knowledge that they are being attacked and they are responding according to what is being stated in the question. This is only a sign of guilt, deception and weakness. Like the Shaykh advised: “Establish the throne [first]!” by providing your evidence, then make accusations! Not make accusations then fail to provide the evidence after being requested to do so. They are only proving that their accusations are hollow and void of evidence. We have previously challenged them to establish the throne and provide evidence for this allegation, but they turned around and realized that there was no throne to establish! So as their argument began crumbling down around them, they found nothing to latch on to except judging peoples’ intentions and spreading malicious gossip and rumors that have reached them from unverifiable and ambiguous sources, along with posting images from websites other than and playing a game of connect the dots which cannot be connected except with twisted lines.

In another question that was posed to Shaykh Muhammad ibn Haadee (may Allaah preserve him). The questioner states[15]:

“Likewise, he was with the jamaa’ah (faction) in Madinah who took up a position against the Maktabah, and announced (and propagated) the likes of these affairs on the Internet on a website called Madeenah.Com.”

Here is another rare occasion where the question posed to the people of knowledge is actually presented to the readers with audio. It is also an example of the misinformation that they pass on.

Where is the evidence for this claim that is being presented? Where exactly has “announced (and propagated)” that they have taken a ‘position against the Maktabah’ on

Again, we request that the exact url link and text be provided for this claim, before or at the time the question was posed, as a claim without proof holds no weight and the burden of proof is upon the claimant. We sincerely hope that they were truthful when speaking to the people of knowledge and present some type of evidence, as we are not requesting it for the mere challenge. If indeed there exists evidence of what they describe with their tongues, then we would like to know where it is. The stark reality is, however, that they have built a case without evidence and their inability to provide the evidence they are being requested to present only confirms this reality. We advise them as well as anyone who asks questions to scholars with the following words from some of the people of knowledge:

Shaykh Saalih Aal ash-Shaykh (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

“…it is befitting for the questioner, rather it is obligatory upon him to fully explain the question to the shaykh he is asking and his intent behind it, he must not be deceitful.”[16]

Shaykh Mis’id al-Husaynee (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

“There are two people whom you must not conceal anything from if you would like to benefit from them; the doctor and the Faqeeh (scholar). Because you may conceal something from them which would have an effect on the response, whether it is from the doctor or the Faqeeh.”[17]

So imagine the case with responses where information is not only being concealed, but misinformation is being presented. Instead of mentioning the reality of the situation in the question to Shaykh Muhammad ibn Haadee (may Allaah preserve him) by saying that some Mashayikh have criticized Salafi Publications and published the material on, the above false scenario is portrayed to the Shaykh. And this is just one example of the blatant misinformation being transmitted to some Mashayikh as has been brought to our attention.

It is also necessary to note the criticism targeted at, in this example, in light of what has already been addressed in documents 1a and 1b. The claimants are not bothered with the content of the criticism published on, i.e. whether or not it is correct, nor who their criticizers are. Their primary concern has been that their group was criticized and a ‘position was taken against them’. If they are not aware of what Hizbiyyah is, then it is cautiously understandable that they are inadvertently falling into it, but what demands serious attention is how they are dangerously cultivating their audience upon it.

Before moving on to provide evidence for deception where the questions were concealed, and being that Salafi Publications are scheduled to be present in Saudi Arabia soon, we would like to address the following point:

If two parties who adhere to the Sunnah dispute, and the affair is taken to the people of knowledge, both parties need to be present. This helps ensure that the situation is presented fairly to the people of knowledge and minimizes the opportunity for those who have agendas to pass on misinformation and lies. Thus far in this case, one side is respecting the truth and the etiquette of criticism by providing solid evidence for inaccuracies, lies and misinformation being passed on to the scholars, while the other is only providing hollow allegations void of any direct evidence, expecting that this will be accepted just because they say it is so.

Strange indeed it is that Salafi Publications claim that students are lying about them, yet in their yearly visits to Madeenah they have not once requested that the students be present in their visits to the people of knowledge to expose their lies. To the contrary, it was some of the translators from who initiated the meeting which took place in Shaykh Khaalid ar-Radaadee’s home where both parties were present – as was Shaykh ‘Abdullaah al-Bukhaaree. The evidence was presented to them privately and not once did they challenge it or claim that it was lies. Rather they admitted their faults and promised to write a retraction that subsequently never materialized.[18]

Likewise in their previous visit to Madeenah last year, one of the translators contacted Abu Khadeejah both by phone and email and invited him to resolve this issue with the scholars of his choice, however, he declined stating that he does not have the time for it. Stranger it is that he has time to write page after page and engage in discussion after discussion concerning this affair, yet when given the opportunity to do so in the presence of the scholars and translators, he seems not to have the time for it. It is sad to see this state of affairs concerning the Da’wah, yet when a call is made for both parties to sit together with the scholars in order to deal with the affair, it is totally avoided by one party. The irony increases when are then accused of using scholars for their own political agendas, when the evidence in this email makes it clear that not only were they willing to sit with the scholars to address these affairs, a request was actually initiated by to Salafi Publications during their visit to Madeenah to settle this affair with the scholars of their choice. The email can be found in the appendix[19]. And we now request, once again, in their current visit to Madeenah, to repeat their allegations against the site and its translators in the presence of both parties.

Let them claim that attacks the Salafees and allow Shaykh Khaalid ar-Raddaadee the opportunity to respond to this blatant lie, being that it was he who mentioned them on the site and requested his material to be published.

Let them claim that Shaykh Waseeullaah is being lied to, used and influenced by the translators, and let it be Shaykh Waseeullaah himself who responds to this allegation and clarify his stance towards them directly, as he himself said; ‘I debated them in every minor and major issue and found them to be erroneous.’ He has agreed that he is willing to be present when they repeat such claims about him in the presence of other Mashayikh, all they need to do is provide us with the dates when they will be addressing these issues and we will be there insha’Allaah.

Let them bring real evidence, not the connect-the-dots-with-twisted-lines game, for their claim that defends, promotes, and cooperates with “enemies of the da’wah”. Provide the exact url link and quote where supports and cooperates with hizbees and innovators. Until then, we leave the reader with what the supervisor of this site, Shaykh Khaalid ar-Raddaadee (may Allaah preserve him), has said concerning the issue of holding the website and its contributors responsible for actions specific to an individual translator.

The Shaykh (may Allaah preserve him) said[20], “…the website is not responsible whatsoever for statements and actions specific to any particular translator. Rather the avenue of sincere advice remains open if it is indeed established that he has made a mistake deserving of admonition. Thus, it is totally incorrect that the website or the rest of the translators are held responsible for activities specific to a particular translator. is only responsible for that which is published on the website.”

He further added, “The allegations of Salafi Publications that we defend these organizations is a lie which has no truth to it. Their pathetic efforts to link [] to Jami’yyah Ahl al-Hadeeth because of a particular translator delivering a lecture with someone else who delivers lectures in a Masjid connected to the Jami’yyah, or other forms of inadequate proof, is simply a futile attempt to link together that which is not connected.”

And to Allaah alone belongs all praise.

To be continued…

Prepared by:
Abu ‘Abdul-Waahid Nadir Ahmed
Abu ‘Abdur-Razzaaq Tahir Wyatt
Abu ‘Abdullaah Mohammed Akhtar Chaudhry

Have you read Part A and Part B yet?

Uncovering the Absurdities behind the Claim of ‘Attacking the Salafees’ – A

Uncovering the Absurdities behind the Claim of ‘Attacking the Salafees’ – B

[1] Al-Maa’idah: 8

[2] Tafseer at-Tabaree (6/141)

[3] An Nahl: 90

[4] Tafseer Ibn Katheer (4/595)

[5] Saheeh Muslim (2577)

[6] It is strange that they accuse others of the tactics they employ themselves, which is another underlying theme we have noticed; they criticize others due to suspecting them of doing exactly what they themselves are guilty of.








[14] This statement is used in Arabic when one thing is conditional upon another thing happening first. The Shaykh is saying, “Bring the evidence, then debate.”


[16] Adab al-Suaal: P.42


[18] Shaykh Khaalid ar-Raddaadee, may Allaah preserve him, stated after giving up on their long awaited clarification that they had promised him to write after this meeting: “And so we had given them advice, and they promised us that they would write something to show that they have retracted from a lot of these issues, and we are still waiting for them to proclaim publicly their retraction as well as their Taubah from some issues and errors that they fell into.”

[19] Specimen of First eMail sent to Abu Khadeejah

From: **************
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 2:21 PM
Cc: *******; ***********; ***********;

As salaamu ‘Alaykum wa Rahmatullah,

My brother in Islaam and Salafiyyah; Abu Khadeejah, It has reached me that you have had a sitting with the brothers of Canada, I am addressing you concerning this directly since it seems that you are addressing everyone else except those directly involved who are also present here during your visits.

From what has reached me of your speech, I say that you have told lies to these brothers, if their narrations are accurate, or at best greatly twisted the truth, which is extremely disappointing when put alongside your claims of giving Da’wah for so long upon the path of our beloved Mashayikh. I would like to request that you to repeat your statements in my presence and in the presence of the three Mashayikh involved, that is Shaykh Muhammad, Shaykh ‘Abdullah, and Shaykh Khaalid may Allaah preserve them all. You can also bring along whom you wish amongst those who have narrated these lies to you and I too will invite some of the brothers who are directly involved in these issues.

Being that you are still here, now would be a good opportunity to do this, so that all involved can hear the opinions of the Mashayikh directly and that they may direct all of us to what Allaah loves and is pleased with. I am not writing you this so that you may respond to me or that this keeps going back and forth between the two or more of us. I am writing this so that this issue may be taken to the scholars, and that the truth is ascertained from falsehood in their presence and that a solution is provided from them, not us.

Awaiting your response.

Barak Allaahu feek.

Abu ‘Abdul Waahid

Specimen of second eMail sent to Abu Khadeejah

From: **************
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 12:14 AM
Cc: *******; ***********; ***********;
Subject: RE:

As salaamu alaykum,

I am writing you brothers this after speaking with Abu Khadeejah on the phone, being that he has denied saying some of the things that were related to me and declined to sit with the Mashayikh concerning these issues which was the reason why I called him.

This is what I remember from the conversation, this is out of memory and he is free to correct me if he likes. I am writing this so that the qeel and qaal narrations can come to an end and everything can be put out in the open for all to see.

I told him that I would like him to repeat the allegations he ‘supposedly’ made about me and in front of the Mashayikh mentioned earlier, he said that he has no time for this.

I told him that he has time to sit and speak about this for 2 hours with others yet he has no time to sit and discuss it with the mashayikh?

I told him that he has spoken about me personally, he said that since I seem to have already made up my mind about that and I came to a decision then there is nothing to say. Which implies that the narrations that reached me were untrue.

I told him obviously I wasn’t there to hear it myself so this is what was said to me by more than one brother, he said I should have clarified (the obvious) from the beginning.

I said that he claims that I defend the jamieeyah amongst other things.

He said that all that he said was that there was no evidence for the allegations made on, and that the fatwa online mailing list puts out events by the jamiyyah, and he spoke about the lies that were told to Shaykh Waseeullaah ‘Abbass, may Allaah preserve him, in Birmingham.

I told him that if he wants Islaah that we can bring all this up with the mashayikh so that they give a final solution to this issue.

He said I already had my chance and he is not interested and has no time for a sitting on these issues and he was not happy with the way it went the last time.

He said that if the evidence was brought then he is willing to sit. The issue is, I am not asking him to sit with the Mashayikh to discuss what has already happened years ago or to bring criticisms forward, I am asking him to bring his present mulahadhaat and criticisms about me, fatwaonline and that he is currently spreading to the mashayikh in our presence.

I would have liked to ask him about other things that he supposedly said but after I let him finish what he had to say he told me that he has to go and cannot speak anymore as something came up.

I pray that the truth is made manifest and that Allaah blesses all those involved to give up all personal issues and put the truth before them and follow it. I advise all the brothers to discard all that they are hearing and to ask the Mashayikh themselves who have been involved with this from the start and take their directions from them if they need clarification on these matters, and to busy themselves with beneficial knowledge and take their salafiyyah from the Mashayikh of Salafiyyah who are around them.


Authored by Madeenah.Com Administration
Date Published: Monday, 02 May 2011
These notes have been read 411 times
Print these notes
The author of these notes affirms the accuracy of his notes in accordance with the Noble Qur.aan and the Authentic Sunnah. Should you have any comment(s) and/or correction(s) to suggest, please write to us at:

…and your email will be passed on to him, inshaa.-Allaah.